Leaving WonderCon 2013, with Star Trek Into Darkness coming out and Star Trek VII in the works, what better time to write about the
infamous Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. I’ll tell you where I’m going to end –
there shouldn’t really be a debate. They are both different things with
different purposes (until JJ Abrams that is). Care to read on? Ok…
My analogy is this – if Star Trek is your fruits & vegetables,
then Star Wars is a desert. For that reason, Star Trek can be a bit trying at
times – it is often a little bland, there are many courses of it (twelve movies
and five TV shows), but it has some nutrients that a desert doesn’t have. And
continuing with the analogy, Star Wars often serves up something amazingly
tasty. And sometimes it’s a little thing- too much sugar with not enough base
substance.
Star Trek’s biggest difference from Star Wars is that it
presented us with a future to look up to. Much like a good parent or idealistic
thinker, Star Trek challenges it’s viewers to look boldly into the future with
the possibilities it possesses. Needless to say, many of Star Trek’s technology
has inspired, led to, or organically come to be in our current technology…
We’ve already had the original series’ communicators (cell phones),
PADDS (iPads), and of course with those voice activation, and GPS (I have taken
notes on my phone and e-mailed them to myself and thought “should I start by
saying Captain’s Log?). Now we have developed tractor beams, phasers, and cell
phones are becoming able to, with the right apps and extensions, become
mini-tricorders.
Star Wars has possesses nothing that tries to lead us to
greater future. There isn’t much technology in Star Wars that isn’t generalized
technology that any sci-fi movies posses. There is nothing specific that leads
us to want to build a better society. Star Wars presents us with a gritty world
at war. It’s not about where society can go – it’s about good vs evil.
And now I want to give a little shout out that Star Wars,
like any good desert, is well prepared. It presents a compelling age-old storyline,
top-notch special effects, and is something almost anybody wants to return to again
and again. How often does anybody, especially a child, really really really
want that broccoli – um, never. Star Wars was influenced by the great masters
of film-making and has returned that same favor.
I haven’t ever heard
a filmmaker say that they went into the business because of Star Trek. Though I
have heard many scientists say that…
One of my favorite moments of Star Trek is from the film Star Trek: First Contact. Often Star
Trek is best represented in is ideals through the TV shows and not the movies,
but there is a moment when Captain Picard is on board the Enterprise showing a
person from the past around the starship. She asks “How could you afford all of
this?” He explains that in the future money doesn’t exist (at least not on
Earth). We all live to better ourselves and our society. As much fun as Star Wars
is, as much as I love Yoda and Luke (probably 10x more than any singular Star
Trek character), that is something to live and strive for.
It’s inspired actual scientists
and technology innovators. It’s first two shows are about exploring and
understanding the universe around you (and the choices you face doing so).
Most people like Star Wars better. Of course they do. How
often do you hear, at the end of a (sometimes fulfilling, sometimes a little
bland) meal, someone go “oh, and now you’ve GOT to try this desert.” We love
desert. And 95% of the time, that’s what our entertainment is – desert. It’s TV
shows after work, or a movie on the weekend. You’d never take a date to get
broccoli.
The Star Trek fans are the people looking for a bit something
more. Who wanted a bit more than just entertainment.
This wouldn’t be complete, of course, without looking at the
2009 Star Trek. Often joked about as being more Wars than Trek (and director JJ
Abrams now moving onto Wars itself), it takes the substance out of Trek and
replaces it with frosting. Tasty, tasty, frosting.
I can’t hate the 2009 Star Trek. I was taken back and a
little unsure when I first saw it, but ultimately grew to love it as a fine
desert. And I understand why classic Trek fans are upset - they want a new
serving of their favorite meal.
But you know what, Star Trek fans – the movies were almost
always desert. Movies are desert.
Almost always. Wrath of Khan –
nothing there but revenge and a dish best served cold. The two most proactive
thought-provoking films are The Voyage Home (or
Greenpeace: The Movie), and The Undiscovered Country (my favorite in message –racism, and the length people will go when they
are politically scared). And while they kept a bit of that idealism that is
Star Trek (though 2009’s was wavering and I’m not sure about Into Darkness), it wasn’t ever 100%
there. So JJ’s Trek isn’t a 100% departure from what many of Trek’s fans loved,
but then again it has just that much less nutrition than the other meals.
Many people don’t - or don’t want to -think with any depth
while being entertained. They don’t want to be presented with conflicts of
society or lessons in getting along on a global, er, planetary sense. Star Wars
is far more entertaining than Star Trek will ever be (ok, I haven’t seen Into Darkness but I don’t see it beating
Empire Strikes Back). But that doesn’t
mean that it’s better.
It’s just a different part of your dining experience.








